
11
in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise
from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these syndicate annual accounts.
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures
in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities,
including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is
detailed below.
Based on our understanding of the syndicate and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-
compliance with laws and regulations related to breaches of regulatory principles, such as those governed by
the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority, and those regulations set by the
Council of Lloyd’s, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the
syndicate annual accounts. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the
syndicate annual accounts such as The Insurance Accounts Directive (Lloyd’s Syndicate and Aggregate
Accounts) Regulations 2008 and the Lloyd’s Syndicate Instructions. We evaluated management’s incentives
and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the syndicate annual accounts (including the risk of override of
controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journals to increase
revenue or reduce expenditure or to manipulate members’ balances. We also considered management bias in
accounting estimates and judgemental areas of the syndicate annual accounts such as the valuation of the
technical provisions for claims outstanding.
Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included:
●
discussions with senior management involved in the Risk and Compliance functions, including
consideration of known or suspected instance of non-compliance with laws and regulation and fraud;
●
assessment of any matters reported on the whistleblowing helpline and fraud register and the results of
management’s investigation of such matters;
●
reading key correspondence with Lloyd’s in relation to compliance with laws and regulations;
●
reviewing relevant meeting minutes including those of the Audit Committee;
●
testing journal entries identified in accordance with our risk assessment;
●
designing audit procedures to incorporate unpredictability around the nature, timing or extent of our
testing; and
●
testing material transactions entered into outside or the normal course of business, where relevant.
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of
instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions
reflected in the syndicate annual accounts. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud
is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by,
for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the syndicate annual accounts is located on the FRC’s
website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors’ report.
Use of this report
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the syndicate’s member in accordance
with part 2 of The Insurance Accounts Directive (Lloyd’s Syndicate and Aggregate Accounts) Regulations 2008
and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other
purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where
expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.